data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84df0/84df03b4281c8545c8cd950bd24589c48f35a8b6" alt=""
Because the letter speaks frankly of creating new structures outside the denomination, some have seen it as the first step towards a split, or schism, in the church. Indeed, the letter itself acknowledges "the appearance of schism" - dancing right up to the edge of advocating a split in the church, without actually saying so.
Others aren't so sure, preferring to read the letter as advocating a more flexible, "missional" approach towards church order. Such an approach would replace some of the hard-and-fast institutional boundaries of our present polity with more flexible, "permeable" structures.
It's hard to say whether the signers of the letter are still in the process of working out a specific list of changes they'll be calling for, or whether their minds are already made up and they're just being cagey.
The three senior leaders of the denomination - General Assembly Moderator Cynthia Bolbach, Stated Clerk Gradye Parsons and General Assembly Mission Council Executive Director Linda Valentine - have issued a letter of their own. Their tone is conciliatory, an invitation to dialogue.
All of this, of course, is being played out against a backdrop of presbytery voting on proposed amendments to the Form of Government - particularly the controversial new language replacing G-6.0106b, dealing with qualifications for ordained officers.
I understand there is an old Chinese curse that goes like this: "May you live in interesting times."
Well, these times sure are getting more interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment